The Challenges of Evaluating Confessions in Pennsylvania Criminal Trials

In Pennsylvania, as in most other states, the jury plays an important role in evaluating the genuineness and voluntariness of any defendant’s confession. In this blog post, we will explore the language of the jury trial in Pennsylvania and discuss the phenomenon of false confessions.

Under Pennsylvania law, a defendant’s confession can be admitted as evidence in court, but only if it is voluntary and not the result of coercion, duress, or other improper means. The jury must evaluate the circumstances surrounding the confession to determine whether it was genuine and voluntary.

In evaluating the genuineness and voluntariness of a confession, the jury must consider several factors, including the age, education, and intelligence of the defendant, the length and circumstances of the interrogation, and any promises or threats made by law enforcement. The jury must also consider any evidence of physical or mental coercion or any other factors that may have influenced the defendant’s decision to confess.

Pennsylvania’s jury trial language specifically instructs jurors that they must evaluate the confession based on whether it was “the product of the defendant’s free and unconstrained choice.” The language also instructs jurors that they must consider whether any promises, threats, or other forms of coercion were used to obtain the confession.

Despite the jury’s role in evaluating the genuineness and voluntariness of a confession, false confessions are still a phenomenon that occurs in criminal cases. False confessions can occur for a variety of reasons, including coercion, mental illness, fatigue, mistake, or a desire to please law enforcement. In some cases, false confessions have even been obtained from innocent defendants who were later exonerated through DNA evidence or other means.

In conclusion, the jury plays an important role in evaluating the genuineness and voluntariness of any defendant’s confession in Pennsylvania. Jurors must carefully consider the circumstances surrounding the confession and evaluate whether it was the product of the defendant’s free and unconstrained choice. Despite these safeguards, false confessions can still occur, and it is important for law enforcement and the justice system to take steps to minimize the risk of false confessions and ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.

Our Clients are entitled to a Bill of Rights which states:

  • Our clients have the right to expect, we will be proactive in communication. You will hear it from us first. We will return all phone calls, texts and emails promptly.
  • Our clients have the right to expect plain speaking, straight shooting. No B. S.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to do it right the first time, every time.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to be on time and professionally prepared for all court appearances, and all meetings.
  • Our clients have the right to expect that they will be fully informed at all times.

This is our promise to you. Call today to get us on your side: (717) 657-3900.

PA DUI attorney Justin J. McShane is the President/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC - Pennsylvania's top criminal law and DUI law firm. He is the highest rated DUI attorney in PA as rated by Avvo.com. Justin McShane is a double Board certified attorney. He is the first and so far the only Pennsylvania attorney to achieve American Bar Association recognized board certification in DUI defense from the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. He is also a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approved Agency.