When a person is convicted of a crime in Pennsylvania, the judge will take into consideration various factors when determining the appropriate sentence. One such factor is the presence of mitigating circumstances. Mitigating circumstances are factors that suggest a lower sentence would be appropriate, such as the offender’s lack of prior criminal history or evidence of rehabilitation. In this blog post, we will discuss what can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence in Pennsylvania.
Lack of prior criminal history: If the offender has little or no prior criminal history, this can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence. A lack of prior criminal history suggests that the offender is not a repeat offender and is less likely to commit future crimes. This can be seen as a positive factor and can result in a lower sentence.
Cooperation with law enforcement: If the offender cooperated with law enforcement, this can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence. Cooperation can include providing information about the crime or assisting law enforcement in other ways. This can be seen as a positive factor and can result in a lower sentence.
Evidence of rehabilitation: If the offender has shown evidence of rehabilitation, such as completing a drug or alcohol treatment program, this can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence. Rehabilitation suggests that the offender is taking steps to address the underlying issues that led to the crime and is less likely to commit future crimes. This can be seen as a positive factor and can result in a lower sentence.
Mental health or substance abuse issues: If the offender has mental health or substance abuse issues that contributed to the crime, this can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence. Mental health or substance abuse issues can impair an offender’s judgment and can be seen as a mitigating factor. In some cases, the judge may recommend treatment as part of the sentence.
Remorse: If the offender shows genuine remorse for their actions, this can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence. Remorse suggests that the offender understands the impact of their actions and is taking responsibility for them. This can be seen as a positive factor and can result in a lower sentence.
In conclusion, mitigating circumstances are factors that suggest a lower sentence would be appropriate. Some examples of factors that can be used to justify a mitigated range sentence in Pennsylvania include a lack of prior criminal history, cooperation with law enforcement, evidence of rehabilitation, mental health or substance abuse issues, and genuine remorse. It is important to note that the determination of mitigating circumstances is up to the judge’s discretion, and the presence of these factors may not always result in a lower sentence. Ultimately, the goal of mitigating circumstances is to ensure that justice is served and that the sentence is appropriate for the crime committed.
Our Clients are entitled to a Bill of Rights which states:
- Our clients have the right to expect, we will be proactive in communication. You will hear it from us first. We will return all phone calls, texts and emails promptly.
- Our clients have the right to expect plain speaking, straight shooting. No B. S.
- Our clients have the right to expect us to do it right the first time, every time.
- Our clients have the right to expect us to be on time and professionally prepared for all court appearances, and all meetings.
- Our clients have the right to expect that they will be fully informed at all times.
This is our promise to you. Call today to get us on your side: (717) 657-3900.
